Dr. Paolo Cioni: Howcome scientific circles persist in asserting that the cell has existed through evolution even though the evidence suggests otherwise?
You are examining the cell at your laboratory every day. While it is impossible to see a single evidence under the microscope suggesting the cell has come into existence through a chain of coincidences, why do you think the claim suggesting that the living cell existed through an evolutionary process caused by coincidences has become the dominant belief among the scientific circles?
I think that rather than a direct examination of the evidence that supports this theory there have been political reasons that have led to the prevalence of a particular form of thought. This thought has been settled in such a way as to have a total influence on common thought in generating a form of unique way of thinking.